File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Biomechanical aspects of oral implants Consensus report of Working Group I

TitleBiomechanical aspects of oral implants Consensus report of Working Group I
Authors
Issue Date2006
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 SUPPL. 2, p. 52-54 How to Cite?
AbstractThe method used by the working group was an iterative process based upon a structured review of the relevant literature by a group of rapporteurs. The review papers were circulated to the members of the group before the conference and formed the basis for subsequent discussions. Each paper was subject to detailed collective analysis and subsequently modified on the basis of the panel's discussions and referenced to additional relevant literature where appropriate. The group assessed the levels of evidence for the statements made in the supporting documentation and recognized that it was necessary to adopt a compromise between acceptance of the lowest level, resulting in the largest body of material, and the highest level, which, in some cases, produced little evidence. While this approach does not represent endorsement of lower evidence levels per se, it was designed to provide conclusions of clinical utility within the existing knowledge base. The consensus statements were prepared after a detailed consideration of the papers submitted to the workshop by the working group. The papers were scrutinized, amended and approved by the group. The basis of each paper is described in the section on 'search strategy' and defines the parameters within which the consensus statements were prepared. © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154422
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHobkirk, JAen_US
dc.contributor.authorWiskott, HWAen_US
dc.contributor.authorAparicio, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorBolz, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsidor, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorNkenke, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorRenouard, Fen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:14Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2006, v. 17 SUPPL. 2, p. 52-54en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154422-
dc.description.abstractThe method used by the working group was an iterative process based upon a structured review of the relevant literature by a group of rapporteurs. The review papers were circulated to the members of the group before the conference and formed the basis for subsequent discussions. Each paper was subject to detailed collective analysis and subsequently modified on the basis of the panel's discussions and referenced to additional relevant literature where appropriate. The group assessed the levels of evidence for the statements made in the supporting documentation and recognized that it was necessary to adopt a compromise between acceptance of the lowest level, resulting in the largest body of material, and the highest level, which, in some cases, produced little evidence. While this approach does not represent endorsement of lower evidence levels per se, it was designed to provide conclusions of clinical utility within the existing knowledge base. The consensus statements were prepared after a detailed consideration of the papers submitted to the workshop by the working group. The papers were scrutinized, amended and approved by the group. The basis of each paper is described in the section on 'search strategy' and defines the parameters within which the consensus statements were prepared. © Blackwell Munksgaard 2006.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subject.meshBite Forceen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseousen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Designen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis Retentionen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subject.meshDental Stress Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshOsseointegrationen_US
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical aspects of oral implants Consensus report of Working Group Ien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01358.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16968381-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33748304331en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33748304331&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issueSUPPL. 2en_US
dc.identifier.spage52en_US
dc.identifier.epage54en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000240804800006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHobkirk, JA=7004179068en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWiskott, HWA=7003349901en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAparicio, C=7003598391en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBolz, W=22933803700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridIsidor, F=7004062803en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNkenke, E=6701458090en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRenouard, F=6602150831en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats