File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances.

TitleSkeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances.
Authors
Issue Date2005
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1601-6335&site=1
Citation
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2005, v. 8 n. 1, p. 2-10 How to Cite?
AbstractAUTHORS: Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler MA. OBJECTIVE: Based on an extensive review of the literature, the aim of this study was to explore the mainstream consensus on the controversial topic of whether the bite jumping treatment could enhance mandibular growth. DESIGN: The data for removable and fixed functional appliances were respectively comprehended and analyzed with regard to their attributes in mandibular growth modification. Furthermore, numerous reported findings were assessed by relating them to some important factors influencing the effects of bite jumping, such as treatment timing, treatment duration and post-treatment follow-up, to allow for a more objective and accurate evaluation. RESULTS: The key differences between removable and fixed appliances are working hours (intermittent vs. continuous), length of treatment time (long vs. short), optimal treatment timing (before puberty growth vs. at or after puberty spurt), and mode of bite-jumping (considerable vertical opening vs. limited vertical opening). These different features lead to different treatment effects on mandibular and TMJ growth, such as the intensity of possibly increased growth (clinically less significant vs. significant), the direction of enhanced growth (vertical vs. horizontal), and the stability of treatment changes (unstable vs. stable). The short-term or long-term post-treatment relapse mainly relates to the rebound of dental position. CONCLUSION: The immediate effects of bite jumping functional appliances on the mandibular growth enhancement are convincing during actual treatment. This extra gain of growth might be sustainable during the short-term and long-term post-treatment period.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154298
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.64
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.881

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShen, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorHägg, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorDarendeliler, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:24:28Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:24:28Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2005, v. 8 n. 1, p. 2-10en_US
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154298-
dc.description.abstractAUTHORS: Shen G, Hagg U, Darendeliler MA. OBJECTIVE: Based on an extensive review of the literature, the aim of this study was to explore the mainstream consensus on the controversial topic of whether the bite jumping treatment could enhance mandibular growth. DESIGN: The data for removable and fixed functional appliances were respectively comprehended and analyzed with regard to their attributes in mandibular growth modification. Furthermore, numerous reported findings were assessed by relating them to some important factors influencing the effects of bite jumping, such as treatment timing, treatment duration and post-treatment follow-up, to allow for a more objective and accurate evaluation. RESULTS: The key differences between removable and fixed appliances are working hours (intermittent vs. continuous), length of treatment time (long vs. short), optimal treatment timing (before puberty growth vs. at or after puberty spurt), and mode of bite-jumping (considerable vertical opening vs. limited vertical opening). These different features lead to different treatment effects on mandibular and TMJ growth, such as the intensity of possibly increased growth (clinically less significant vs. significant), the direction of enhanced growth (vertical vs. horizontal), and the stability of treatment changes (unstable vs. stable). The short-term or long-term post-treatment relapse mainly relates to the rebound of dental position. CONCLUSION: The immediate effects of bite jumping functional appliances on the mandibular growth enhancement are convincing during actual treatment. This extra gain of growth might be sustainable during the short-term and long-term post-treatment period.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1601-6335&site=1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofOrthodontics & craniofacial researchen_US
dc.subject.meshAge Factorsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMandibular Advancement - Instrumentationen_US
dc.subject.meshMandibular Condyle - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Appliance Designen_US
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Appliances, Functionalen_US
dc.subject.meshTemporomandibular Joint - Growth & Developmenten_US
dc.titleSkeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHägg, U:euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHägg, U=rp00020en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid15667639-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-14544307501en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros97189-
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage2en_US
dc.identifier.epage10en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShen, G=7401966958en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHägg, U=7006790279en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridDarendeliler, M=7003378098en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats